The launch is followed by a licensing agreement between Reckitt Benckiser, owner of Veet, and electric beauty manufacturer Helen of Troy. 14. General14.1 These Terms contain the entire agreement between you and us regarding the use of the Website and no warranties, representations or invitations (oral or written) that are not contained in these Terms (as updated from time to time) are binding on you or us.14.2 If any provision of these Terms is held to be unlawful by a court or supervisory authority, Invalid, Invalid or Unenforceable The other provisions continue to apply and this provision is superseded by another provision that is valid in all respects and has effect as close as possible to the superseded provision.14.3 These terms are not intended to grant rights to anyone other than you and us (including our related businesses). With the exception of RB, which has the right to enforce these Terms, none of these Terms is enforceable by third parties, including (if you reside in the United Kingdom) any enforcement by the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.14.4 We may transfer our rights and obligations under these Terms to another organisation. We will contact you to let you know if we intend to do so. (2) the Council did not specify the requirements applicable to the work and (3) the Council had no influence on the nature or design of the work. The Faraday case concerned a decision by West Berkshire Council to enter into a development contract with St Modwen Developments Ltd (St Modwen) for the rehabilitation of an industrial area in Newbury, much of which belonged to the Council. The development agreement was concluded in the context of a competitive procedure. Competition was not a procurement procedure under the PCR, as the Council considered that the agreement was a land transaction that was not subject to the PCR.

However, the Council decided to publish in the Official Journal of the European Union a notice informing the contract of its intention to conclude the contract. . . .